News by sections
ESG

News by region
Issue archives
Archive section
Multimedia
Videos
Podcasts
Search site
Features
Interviews
Country profiles
Generic business image for news article Image: Brian Jackson / Adobestock.com

05 November 2020
London
Reporter Natalie Turner

Share this article





Should the market have opted for a standardised SFTR solution?

The question of whether the securities finance industry should have collaborated on a standardised solution to the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (SFTR) was posed to panellists at the SLT Securities Technology Finance Symposium.

Sarah Nicholson, partner at Consolo and panel moderator, queried whether, in hindsight, market participants would have been better served by a single reporting solution, as opposed to the patchwork quilt of service provider platforms that now exist.

Panellist David Lewis, senior director of securities finance at FIS, suggested that in a perfect world, a standardised solution would be “ideal” but that in reality it “wasn’t practical”.

“I think this is one of the first mandated regulations where an ISO 20022 standard is being applied, and it's from that level forward we have that standardisation, not before,” he explains.

Lewis went on to describe the reality of the many divergent processes that go on, and in the time frame that is allowed across phase one, he explains, “you wouldn’t be able to reorganise an entire industry, there's no way firms were going to cross that many hurdles to come to a single way of doing things”.

The panellists also discussed how SFTR had stimulated a greater level of collaboration in the market but that a single solution would have eliminated the “healthy competition” that often drives innovation.

To underscore this point, Joanne Salkeld, SFTR product manager at MarketAxess, stated that the joint SFTR solution with MarketAxess and EquiLend is their “bread and butter”, but only having one vendor is particularly dangerous.

Salkeld also highlighted that multiple solution providers are necessary to protect against the scenario of the sole provider leaving the market. She further noted that the recent example of CME exiting the regulatory reporting space had created unexpected disruption for its clients but that this was mitigated by alternative providers that were ready and waiting to take them on.

Elsewhere, Lewis added that “a great deal of good things come out of collaboration between firms, but says that it’s not all been plain sailing” and the journey isn’t over yet.

Referring to Cappitech’s recent regulatory reporting market survey, Lewis highlighted that 46 percent of respondents consider SFTR a major challenge for 2021 and 66 percent give a lack of expertise as a major concern.

Highlighting specifically the lack of crossover between the experts in reporting with people who have knowledge of the specific markets such as securities lending and repo, “the survey suggests that perhaps there aren’t many people who have their foot in both those camps,” Lewis concludes.

As a result, service providers may need to extend a hand to one another to reinforce each others’ strengths and weaknesses and create a complete offering, such as in the case of EquiLend-MarketAxess.

Subscribe advert
Advertisement
Video image
Video:
Securities Finance Technology Symposium

A heartfelt thank you to everyone who made the 6th Securities Finance Technology Symposium in London a resounding success! It was a fantastic day filled with insightful panel sessions covering crucial topics such as repo, regulation, collateral and future tech. Here are some of the highlights

Watch online
View all Videos
Get in touch
News
More sections
Black Knight Media