News by sections
ESG

News by region
Issue archives
Archive section
Multimedia
Videos
Podcasts
Search site
Features
Interviews
Country profiles
Generic business image for news article Image: Aliaksandr_Marko/stock.adobe.com

30 September 2021
US
Reporter Carmella Haswell

Share this article





SEC proposals to increase transparency in proxy voting for investment managers

The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed changes to how investment managers report their proxy votes.

During a commission meeting, SEC chair Gary Gensler introduced two main recommendations; firstly, managers should report their votes on executive compensation matters to investors on Form N-PX; and secondly, amendments should be made to Form N-PX to enhance the information mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and others funds report about their proxy votes.

The proposed rulemaking will require funds to tie the description of each voting matter to the issuer’s form of proxy and to categorise each matter by type to help investors identify votes of interest and compare voting records.

It will also prescribe how funds organise their reports and require them to use a structured data language to make the filings easier to analyse, not to mention disclosing how their securities lending activity impacted their voting.

Further, the current proposals will require institutional investment managers to disclose how they voted on executive compensation, or so-called “say-on-pay” matters, which would fulfil one of the remaining rulemaking mandates under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Form N-PX was first adopted nearly two decades ago and its basic principle was to inform investors how funds voted shares held on their behalf, also known as voting proxies.
The changes have come as a result of investors' concerns surrounding the lack of readily usable information.

Gensler goes on to identify several issues surrounding Form N-PX which include; excessive length of filings; inconsistent reports on votes of the same matter from fund to fund; vague descriptions of votes; and lack of machine-readable format, which prevents investors from downloading information to spreadsheets, making it harder to analyse data.

The public comment period for these recommendations will remain open for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Subscribe advert
Advertisement
Video image
Video:
Securities Finance Technology Symposium

A heartfelt thank you to everyone who made the 6th Securities Finance Technology Symposium in London a resounding success! It was a fantastic day filled with insightful panel sessions covering crucial topics such as repo, regulation, collateral and future tech. Here are some of the highlights

Watch online
View all Videos
Get in touch
News
More sections
Black Knight Media