Transcend is rapidly expanding in Asia. What is driving this movement?
Transcend’s expansion into Asia reflects both the natural evolution of our client base and increasing regional demand for more sophisticated collateral and liquidity optimisation capabilities. Building on our early footprint in the Americas and expansion in the European markets, we now have clients on the ground in Asia and are seeing exponential growth driven by the need for new technology to meet more complex market needs, growing portfolio return expectations and desire to be better positioned operationally to handle market stress when it inevitably arrives. As a result, there has been a significant increase in inbound interest from Asian banks and buy side firms for our solutions, as well as demand from global banks seeking to extend optimisation strategies across their regional entities.
Asia also represents one of the most dynamic and rapidly evolving collateral environments globally. The region consists of multiple expanding jurisdictions, including both mature and emerging markets, each with differing collateral restrictions, regulations, and infrastructure maturity levels. This creates a heterogeneous marketplace that introduces significant complexity for institutions attempting to mobilise collateral efficiently across entities and borders.
Unlike Europe and North America, where regulatory frameworks such as EMIR, Dodd-Frank, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulation, helped drive market standardisation and centralisation, Asia continues to operate across a more fragmented infrastructure landscape, which is where we can help. However, the region is undergoing meaningful transformation. Securities finance activity is growing rapidly in markets such as Taiwan and Thailand, while regulatory and market modernisation initiatives including the expansion of collateral acceptability, developments around China government bonds as eligible collateral, digital tokenisation, T-0 pilots, and programmes such as Hong Kong Stock Connect are expanding cross-border market participation and a need for innovation. At the same time, institutions across the region are steadily increasing their use of secured funding, further elevating the strategic importance of collateral efficiency.
The expansion is therefore both proactive and client led. Transcend’s solutions are designed to be scalable across jurisdictions, allowing institutions to apply consistent collateral and liquidity management strategies globally while accounting for regional market nuances. Our clients also benefit from our established global footprint, including our large operational presence in India, which supports our ability to serve clients across time zones and regulatory environments.
How do you see collateral and liquidity challenges in Asian markets differing from those in Europe and North America?
Asian markets present a fundamentally more fragmented operating environment with unique characteristics compared with Europe and North America. Firms in Asia often operate across multiple regulatory jurisdictions, including established securities finance markets like Singapore, Korea, Malaysia, Japan, Hong Kong, Australia, and other emerging or regional financial hubs. Each jurisdiction maintains its own regulatory constraints, collateral eligibility frameworks and settlement conventions, which significantly complicates consolidated inventory visibility and enterprise-level optimisation.
A key differentiator is the relative lack of interconnected market infrastructure between entities, custodians, trading venues, and funding channels. This can result in significant volumes of trapped or operationally inaccessible collateral, where assets held within certain entities or jurisdictions cannot be easily mobilised to meet obligations elsewhere within the same organisation.
By comparison, European markets benefit from a highly developed triparty collateral infrastructure that allows desks to optimise collateral usage efficiently within a standardised and centralised framework. Asian markets, while sophisticated, tend to rely more heavily on bilateral trading relationships, largely as a result of fragmentation and differing stages of infrastructure adoption. This reduces the ease of collateral mobilisation and has historically slowed the widespread adoption of centralised collateral utilities that are now commonplace in Europe and North America.
That said, the landscape is shifting. Both global institutions and regional players are becoming increasingly focused on unlocking cross-border optimisation opportunities. Many APAC institutions are expanding their use of multiple triparty agents to increase operational efficiency and reduce time zone dependencies to support more automated collateral workflows. This reflects a growing shift away from traditional models that focused primarily on local asset utilisation toward a more globally integrated collateral strategy.
What pressures are Asian firms facing today when it comes to optimising collateral usage and balance sheet efficiency?
Asian institutions are navigating several structural and operational pressures that influence how they manage collateral and liquidity.
First, the multi-jurisdictional nature of regional operations creates challenges around regulatory compliance, legal entity setups, and capital allocation. Institutions must constantly balance local regulatory obligations with enterprise-wide optimisation objectives while managing differing collateral eligibility and reporting requirements.
Second, collateral infrastructure adoption across the region remains at varying stages of development. While triparty frameworks and centralised optimisation capabilities are expanding, many institutions continue to operate within hybrid environments that combine bilateral workflows, manual support and emerging automation. This can limit scalability and increase operational risk.
Third, collateral mobility across borders and entities remains one of the most complex operational challenges. Fragmentation across custody networks, settlement systems, and regulatory frameworks can restrict asset movement and limit balance sheet efficiency.
Finally, time zone dynamics introduce additional coordination challenges. Many Asian trading desks remain dependent on liquidity and market activity in Europe and the United States, which creates timing pressures around margin management, funding, and collateral allocation. As settlement cycles shorten and market velocity increases, these pressures are becoming more pronounced.
What challenges do APAC buy side firms face as collateral and liquidity demands intensify across the region?
APAC buy side firms are navigating a convergence of pressures: collateral mobilisation and cash management windows are shrinking due to regional accelerated settlement pilots; broader eligibility frameworks; growing adoption of Uncleared Margin Regulations; and rising expectations around liquidity governance under stress.
Simultaneously, like their European and North American counterparts, many are moving down the liquidity spectrum, increasing allocations to private markets, alternatives, and offshore assets. But they are doing so against a backdrop of greater jurisdictional fragmentation, adding complexity and creating a potential drag on returns.
The need for enterprise-wide optimisation for asset managers is more acute than ever, requiring an integrated view across asset classes, group entities, counterparties, and jurisdictions.
Buy side firms that can meet these challenges will pull ahead. Specifically, those who:
• build multi-jurisdictional operations that balance regional compliance with enterprise-wide optimisation;
• identify eligible collateral in real time and determine the optimal assets to mobilise;
automate bookings to reduce friction and settlement risk;
integrate securities lending, repo, derivatives margining, and cash management into a single framework;
• develop transfer pricing models that allocate the true cost of funding across business lines, entities, and portfolios;
will be positioned not just to manage complexity, but to turn it into a competitive advantage.
How are regulatory frameworks and market structures across Asia shaping the way firms think about liquidity management?
Securities services providers and custody networks are expanding triparty and collateral management capabilities throughout the region, although adoption remains at varying stages across jurisdictions. Institutions across Asia are not necessarily less sophisticated in their liquidity management approaches, but they are operating at different points along the infrastructure adoption cycle.
Cost considerations, return on investment expectations and market-specific regulatory requirements all influence how firms evaluate advanced collateral optimisation platforms. However, as regulatory requirements evolve and capital efficiency becomes a greater competitive differentiator, institutions are increasingly recognising the strategic importance of integrated liquidity and collateral management.
The continued growth of secured funding markets across Asia is further accelerating this shift. As firms increase their use of repo, securities lending, and derivatives margining strategies, the need for centralised visibility and decision-making across funding and trading activities becomes significantly more important.
Looking ahead, where do you see the biggest opportunities for Asian institutions to improve collateral efficiency and liquidity resilience over the next few years?
One of the most significant opportunities lies in integrating liquidity, collateral, and margin management into a unified optimisation ecosystem. Institutions are increasingly seeking solutions that allow enterprise-level decision making across funding, trading, and risk management functions rather than managing these processes in isolation.
The region is also seeing increasing adoption of securities lending as a strategic liquidity tool, enabling firms to unlock additional balance sheet flexibility while supporting broader funding strategies. Continued expansion of triparty collateral frameworks will further improve operational standardisation and scalability across the region.
Cross-border collateral mobility will remain a critical priority. As APAC institutions expand globally and local firms adopt more international trading strategies, the ability to allocate assets efficiently across entities and jurisdictions will become a defining factor in liquidity resilience and balance sheet performance.
Furthermore, as firms prepare for structural market changes such as T+1 settlement, increased digitalisation, and the growing adoption of artificial intelligence, the ability to operate a fully-optimised collateralised business while remaining flexible enough to adapt to regulatory and market changes will require significant investment and strategic focus.
This is where Transcend’s platform delivers meaningful value. Transcend provides a centralised optimisation framework capable of integrating both triparty and bilateral activity across asset classes including equities, fixed income, cleared and OTC derivatives. By centralising siloed inventory, automating cross-venue collateral movements, and modeling jurisdiction-specific regulatory and market constraints, Transcend enables institutions to optimise collateral usage in near real time within the practical limits of current market infrastructure.
Transcend’s strategic focus is on creating the most comprehensive straight-through processing, cross-venue optimisation framework across triparty agents and central counterparties. This infrastructure provides a proven, off-the-shelf capability that supports all types of financial firms seeking to modernise their collateral and liquidity management strategies.
Next interview →
Global Peer Financing Association
By the members, for the members
Image: Paul Wilson 
